Which hashing algorithm is generally considered insecure due to known collision vulnerabilities?

SHA-256

SHA-1

MD5

Hash functions should be collision-resistant, meaning it should be hard to find two different inputs that produce the same hash. MD5 has known collision vulnerabilities, with practical demonstrations showing that two distinct messages can yield the same MD5 digest. This undermines integrity checks, digital signatures, and certificate validation that rely on a unique, tamper-evident hash. Because of these weaknesses, MD5 is broadly regarded as insecure for security-sensitive tasks and is deprecated in favor of stronger algorithms. The other options are currently considered secure against practical collisions (SHA-256 and SHA-3), while SHA-1 has known weaknesses but is being phased out in favor of stronger hashes; the standout insecure choice in this context is MD5.

SHA-3

Want more questions?

All options are one-time payments.

$12.50

30 day premium pass

All the basics to get you started

  • Ad-free experience
  • View your previous attempt history
  • Mobile app access
  • In-depth explanations
  • 30 day premium pass access
$30.00 $87.50 usd

6 month DELUXE pass (most popular)

Everything with the 30 day premium pass FOR 6 MONTHS! & the ultimate digital PDF study guide (BONUS)

  • Everything included in the premium pass
  • $87.50 usd value for $30.00! You save $57.50!
  • + Access to the ultimate digital PDF study guide
  • + 6 months of premium pass access
  • + Priority support
$12.50 $18.99

Ultimate digital PDF study guide

For those that prefer a more traditional form of learning

  • Available for instant download
  • Available offline
  • Hundreds of practice multiple choice questions
  • Comprehensive content
  • Detailed explanations
Image Description
Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy